CBRNO logo Community Based Research Network of Ottawa map and tulips
About CBRNO Evaluation Tools Available Research Add Your Research Upcoming Events Contact Us Français
green gradient white spacer SPC home
 

 


 

 

Asset-based Community Development

Action Research: links to online resources on Action Research
Action research is a systematic form of inquiry that is collective, collaborative, self-reflective, critical, and undertaken by the participants of the inquiry [McCutcheon, G. & Jung, B. (1990). Alternative perspectives on action research. Theory into Practice 29 (3): 144-151]. Action research, sometimes called "practitioner research," is a reflective investigation of a personal interest, problem or challenge. The process begins with the development of questions, which may be answered by the collection of data. Action implies that the practitioner will be acting as the collector of data, the analyst, and the interpreter of results.

Action Research
This site provides an introduction to action research as well as links to other Action Research sites
- Action Research Defined (Florida Atlantic University)
- What is Action Research? (Pathways)
- Action Research Resources (Bob Dick)
- What is Action Research? (Beverly Johnson)
- Action Research links (Daniel Robertson)
- Corollary sites (that reference this page)

Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women

COMM-ORG The On-Line Conference On Community Organizing and Development

Community-Based Participatory Research. Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH)

CCPH has developed a number of tools and resources for community-based participatory research.

Following is the outline of the contents:
Overview
Tools and Resources
Reports and Presentations
Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles
Syllabi and Course Materials
Electronic Discussion Groups
Web Links
Principles and Policies
Call for Papers

In the spring of 2000, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health commissioned a paper on community-based participatory research and the policy issues affecting such research. Click here to view and print the paper.

Flett Consulting Group Inc./Social Data Research Ltd, Evaluating the Feasibility of Introducing a Retractable Safety Syringe for Use by Ottawa Needle Exchange Program (NEP) Clients. City of Ottawa, Health Department, 2003.

Kaye Seymour-Rolls & Ian Hughes, Participatory Action Research: Getting the Job Done. Action Research Open Web AROW. The University of Sydney. 1995, 2000. Contents
Table of Contents
Introduction
The Moments by Definition
The Moments by Method
A possible PAR project
Conclusion
References

Linda Mayoux, Thinking It Through: Using Diagrams in Impact Assessment. August 2003
This paper significantly updates and expands an earlier paper of the same title and complements a number of other papers on this web site (see Participatory Methods, Empowering Enquiry). It draws substantially on current work by the author and Kabarole Research and Resource Centre (KRC) in Western Uganda to pilot a methodology called PALS (Participatory Action Learning System) which uses diagram methods at all levels to link grassroots learning with programme decision-making and national level advocacy.

OESP Handbook Series, Who Are the Question-makers? A Participatory Evaluation Handbook
(Editorial Board: Sharon Capeling-Alakija, Carlos Lopes, Abdenour Benbouali
and Djibril Diallo - Managing Editor: Janet Donnelly) . OESP, 1997. Office of Evaluation and Strategic Planning, United Nations Development Programme.


Participatory Evaluation online information compiled by L. Coffin. This site, dedicated to Participatory Evaluation, provides link to topics such as:

  • What is Participatory Evaluation?
  • How is it done?
  • What have other organizations done?
  • Other resources!

Participatory Evaluation: a guide and entry way to some of the many resources on the subject of participatory evaluation.

This particular webpage organizes the concept into five (somewhat overlapping) categories, representing participatory evaluation as:

  • related to action research and community-based research;
  • a tool of participatory development, especially international development
    rendered in human services;
  • part of a trio of approaches as framed by the evaluation field's professional association in the U.S.; and
  • related to community indicators.

For each of the PE perspectives noted above, this guide identifies two types of relevant web-based materials, an overview, and gateways to resources.
Those sites selected for overviews are ones which describe or introduce participatory evaluation from one of each of the chosen perspectives. Gateway sites are ones which take the researcher to particularly rich collections of resources, most of which entail materials in both related theory and practice, often including how-to manuals. Brief annotations are given for each site.

Partnership for the Public's Health, Participatory Evaluation: What is it? Why do it? What are the challenges?. April 2002
This brief lays out a framework for understanding the special nature of participatory evaluation, comparing and contrasting it with more traditional forms of evaluation; gives a rationale for its use; provides a short, step-by-step set of instructions on how to implement this approach; and then offers real-world examples of the challenges and rewards in applying the principles of participatory evaluation. Developed by the Partnership for the Public's Health.

Robin McTaggart, 16 Tenets of Participatory Action Research. The Caledonia Centre
for Social Development
(1989).
The 16 tenets of Participatory Action Research outlined in this short note were presented to the 3er Encuentro Mundial Investigacion Participatva (The Third World Encounter on Participatory Research), Managua, Nicaragua, September 3 – 9, 1989. They represent an important reflection and distillation of the praxis of participatory action research, by one of its leading practitioners, during the 1980s. The Caledonia Centre for Social Development, as part of its on-going work in the field of participatory development, wishes to make these tenets accessible to a new generation of social activists and to re-stimulate older practitioners.

Success Measures Guidebook version 1.0 Online. Development Leadership Network. December 1999.
The Guidebook contains 44 indicators and a step-by-step guide for engaging community members to use them for participatory planning and evaluation.

Susan Saegert, Lymari Benitez, Efrat Eizenberg, Tsai-shiou Hsieh, and Mike Lamb, Participatory Evaluation: How It Can Enhance Effectiveness and Credibility of Nonprofit Work City University of New York Graduate Center. Spring 2004
This article is written from an evaluator’s point of view and although the examples focus on community-based organizations, they illustrate broader lessons about accountability, evaluation and participation that should prove useful to any nonprofit leader

Asset-based Community Development

ABCD is a community-driven developmental process that focuses on mobilizing individual and community talents, skills and assets. It is an approach to development that works on many different levels to promote well-being and quality of life for people and their communities.

Asset-Based Community Development Institute (ABCD), established in 1995 by the Community Development Program at Northwestern University's Institute for Policy Research, is built upon three decades of community development research by John Kretzmann and John L. McKnight.
The ABCD Institute spreads its findings on capacity-building community development in two ways: (1) through extensive and substantial interactions with community builders, and (2) by producing practical resources and tools for community builders to identify, nurture, and mobilize neighborhood assets.
Click here to view the Topic Index to ABCD Publications

Click here to access the list of the Workbooks

Center for Collaborative Planning (CCP) promotes health and social justice by providing training and technical assistance and by connecting people and resources.
CCP supports diverse communities in key areas, such as:
Asset-based Community Development (ABCD)
Leadership Development
Working Collaboratively
Community Assessment and Strategic Planning


Community Change Education Project, University of Wisconsin-Madison & Extension
The first-step goal of this site is to provide materials to Extension workers and others in the forefront of community change efforts. The modules below are intended to enhance capacity to do effective community change education.
The second-step goal is for these educators-as-catalysts, in a deliberative way, to share this enhanced capacity with citizens-at-large in their neighborhoods, communities, and organizations.
The third-step goal is for these citizens to take on more of their own business, whatever may be the issues of concern. The issues of public importance are many and complex. Resolving these concerns can use as many hands and heads as good community change education might provide.
Click here to access various tools and publications on Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) such as:

  • ABCD Explored
  • ABCD DOs and DONTs
  • ABCD Step-by-Step
  • ABCD Process & Tools Box
  • ABCD Assessment
  • Learning Styles & Experiential Education
  • Community Problem-Solving Process
  • Community-Level Power Analysis
  • Community Participatory Research
  • Building Community Collaboratives
  • Concept Papers

Connecticut Assets Network (CAN) is a grassroots nonprofit network of citizens and organizations that promote the integration and successful use of asset-based strategies for community development.
The "asset approach" uses the resources and assets of individuals, organizations and communities as the building blocks of successful health promotion strategies. Rather than exclusively looking at problems, deficits, and weaknesses as the focus of program planning, citizens and community policy makers focus on building upon their strengths by discovering and developing their resources.
CAN believes in the notion that for communities to build protective factors (resiliency and assets) in the lives of our youth and families, they need guidance, support and networking. The key is networking through conversation (capacity surveys) and work (projects) to develop asset-rich relationships where people discover their many gifts, talents, and capacities for mutually beneficial problem solving. Environments wherein citizen development and contribution are practiced are the foundation for sustained solutions to problems, and as such are widely recognized as a key to developing healthy youth and communities.

Connecticut Assets Network (CAN), Community Capacity Building Glossary: What is all this jargon?
Every field has its words and the field of assets based community development is no different. Words like assets that usually refer to balance sheets take on an entirely new meaning when applied to people and communities. We hope this listing of words is helpful.

Gord Cunningham and Alison Mathie, Asset-Based Community Development -- An Overview
Coady International Institute.

Human Resources Development Canada, Innovation and Learning For Canadians Office of Learning Technologies
This site provides access to various research reports funded by the Office of Learning Technologies (OLT) Program through its Community Learning Networks (CLN) Initiative

The Office of Learning Technologies (OLT) provides funding to Canadian organizations to expand innovative learning opportunities through technology. The opportunities facilitate adult learning and skills development in order to enable Canadians to fully participate in the workplace and their community.

Community Learning Networks (CLN) Initiative is an OLT funding initiative.It supports community-based pilot projects that demonstrate innovative and sustainable uses of existing network technologies to upgrade skills and knowledge in Canadian communities. These community-based approaches help individuals to prepare for and keep employment and to participate in a culture of lifelong learning.

Community Learning Networks:

  • Use technology as a tool to support and enable learning, skills development and networking;
  • Have a thorough understanding of skills and learning opportunities and needs gained through the creation of a community-based inventory of learning assets and gaps;
  • Demonstrate strong community participation through partnerships with the public, university/college, voluntary and/or private sectors;
  • Promote individual and community development

John P. Kretzmann and John L. McKnight "Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets".Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 1993.

This guide to what the authors call "asset-based community development" summarizes lessons learned by studying successful community-building initiatives in hundreds of neighborhoods across the United States. It outlines in simple, "neighborhood-friendly" terms what local communities can do to start their own journey down the path of asset-based development.
This book will be helpful to local community leaders, leaders of local associations and institutions, government officials, and leaders in the philanthropic and business communities who wish to support effective community-building strategies.
Click here to read the Introduction to "Building Communities from the Inside Out."

Margaret D. Slinski, Building Communities of Support for Families in Poverty. Cooperative Extension University of Massachusetts. 1994

This article is a manual that uses participatory research, education, and evaluation to build sustainable communities of support in high risk neighborhoods throughout the nation.

OECD, Asset Building and the Escape from Poverty: A New Welfare Policy Debate

Governments in developed countries have long used, directly or indirectly through their tax systems, policies that subsidise or otherwise encourage the population at large to acquire assets such as financial savings, home ownership, retirement funds, education (human capital) or business capital. These policies seldom reach the poor. In fact, for the poor these policies often do not stimulate saving but rather discourage it. However, the evidence reported in this book is that the poor want to save, and can do so in modest amounts. In fact, they will do so, often with sacrifices greater than either policy makers or the more well-off might imagine. Extending asset-building policies to the poor can represent an effective attack on both poverty and economic and social alienation of the poor, because it has positive welfare effects that income support alone cannot provide.

This book establishes the context for a fruitful debate on the merits and demerits of asset building for the poor by setting out the basic ideas involved in asset-building programmes and proposals. It also outlines the social policy advantages that their proponents claim, and documents what the existing programmes and demonstration projects look like.

Contact the author at Antonella.Noya@oecd.org
To download free of charge this publication, please visit the OECD Online Bookshop.

Thomas Dewar, A Guide to Evaluating Asset-Based Community Development: Lessons, Challenges, and Opportunities. A Community Building Workbook from The Asset-Based Community Development Institute. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, 1997.
This guide is written primarily for community-building practitioners from the point of view of an experienced evaluator, but it should also be useful for funders and others who would like to be helpful to community builders. This document seeks to provide some guidance about how evaluation strategies can actually improve the work of community builders. It identifies and clarifies some of the most important issues and dilemmas that come up on trying to evaluate community-building projects and suggests ten important principles for those wishing to implement evaluation strategies which are appropriate for this work.

Susy Cheston, Lisa Kuhn, Empowering women through microfinance. Washington DC, USA: Microcredit Summit Campaign. 2002

This paper looks at some of the theories and assumptions behind targeting women for microfinance and their implications for empowerment. Drawing on the studies and experiences of microfinance institutions in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, the paper looks at what evidence there is of impact on women in terms of welfare and empowerment. Although there is no set of indicators of empowerment that can be applied universally across cultures and regions, the authors present evidence of several types of changes that are relevant and important for empowerment across a range of cultures. The paper looks at the case study of the impact on women of Sinapi Aba Trust (SAT), Opportunity International's partner in Ghana. Based on this study several programmatic factors and strategies are identified that can make a positive contribution to women's empowerment and holistic transformation. The paper finally looks at strategies used by MFIs for reaching and empowering women and their results, identifying some of the most promising.

Youth Community Asset Mapping Report. Environmental Youth Alliance. 2003. Prepared by Wei Hsi Hu, (with reports from Jackie Amsden, Nadim Kara, K.K. Law, Diane Macleod, Kristin Pattern, Tammie Tupechka)

The Youth Community Asset Mapping initiative (formerly known as "Rediscovering
Vancouver, Rediscovering Ourselves") arose following consultations with youth through
the Vancouver Windows of Opportunity (1998 - 2001), a community consultation with
inputs from youth, parents, and service providers, and through a United Way funded
youth community consultation in 2000. These processes indicated that a new outreach
mechanism was needed to engage a broad range of youth and that youth desperately
wanted more invovlement opportunities available to them in their communities.
To adress this need, the Self Help Resource Association and the Environmental Youth
Alliance worked in partnership to organize the Youth Community Asset Mapping
Initiative (YCAM).
YCAM began to use the tool of community mapping to increase the capacity of the youth community and began, following their mandate to catalyze the involvement of youth in meaningful social change activities and to connect youth to existing supports and services in their communities.
This report highlights 5 of the 8 projects supported by this initiative, discusses the health outcomes of the projects, and also explores possible directions and potentials for Community Asset Mapping as a Population Health Promotion tool



Home | Evaluation and Research Tools | Available Research | Add Your Research |
Upcoming Events
| Contact Us | Français

© CBRNO, 1999-2002